Muslim British government official pelted with eggs
Dec 1st, 2009 | By Ruqaya Izzidien | Category: Europe, News
MANCHESTER: Baroness Sayeeda Warsi was attacked with eggs on November 30 while doing a circuit of the English town Luton, just outside London.
The protesters, who were all male, accused Baroness Warsi of not being a proper Muslim and said that she does not “represent Islam.â€Â They also said that she supported the death of Muslims in Afghanistan.
The Baroness, who is the Conservative Minister for Community Cohesion and Social Action, had stopped to speak to the group of men, attempting to engage them in a conversation. It was to little avail. She was then taken in to a nearby shop to clear the eggs that had been thrown at her.
She told the local media that had gathered nearby that it was valuable for them to witness the attack as it demonstrates the types of people that do not represent Islam or “real British Muslims.†She commented that it is behavior like this that brings Muslims into “huge disrepute.â€
One of the demonstrators, Sayful Islam, told reporters that Baroness Warsi “is not a practicing Muslim. Clearly by looking at her she does not represent Muslims.†The Baroness was wearing trousers and a sweater, but has her hair uncovered as she does not wear the veil, like a number of British Muslims.
Sayful Islam added that the protesters were “against everything she stands for.â€
The Baroness added to reporters that “I stood up to this group and said I challenge your views,†adding that “they just weren’t prepared to listen. They shouted. I said if you want to have this debate, listen.”
Earlier this year, Warsi was named the most powerful British Muslim woman at an event hosted by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission.
BM
Keep advertising off Bikya Masr - donate $1 to allow this to be possible
This is rich. Another demonstration of “The Religion of Peace”, and further evidence of its freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, love and tolerance.
At least they just threw eggs. According to the article, one of the demonstrators was named “Sayful Islam”. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this an iteration of “Sword of Islam”?
Isn’t the “Sword of Islam” what is used to decapitate infidels and apostate Muslims? Baroness Warsi should count her blessings that she didn’t feel the true hand of Allah, just eggs!! She should just sit down, have a bebzy and a cup of tea!
Oh….And isn’t it the same sword that subjugated infidels from Spain to Indonesia?
Or is that the “Sword of Allah” (Saifullah)? Sometimes I get my Islamic swords confused.
~ The Infidel Alliance
P.S. – The same sword flies on the flag of the worlds most loving, free and tolerant nation, the home of the two holy places, Mecca & Medina, Saudi Arabia. Are you feeling the love yet?
Final thought, as mentioned in a previous post but perfectly applicable here:
Whatever good there may be in Islam, it is all infected and tainted by the death fatwa for apostacy.
Until Muslims are are granted complete freedom of conscience, and are completely and totally free to leave Islam and choose another religion, or reject islam altogether and become an atheist if they wish, Islam will always remain an egg pelting, decapitating, oppressive gulag of terror.
~The Infidel Alliance
Why do you have so much hate filled in you?
Isn’t this woman a muslim too? What about benazir? She was the prime minister of Pakistan. Pakistan has more women in parliament than US or Israel have!
I think you need to stop going to hate filled websites and read some “Muslim” websites
to know about Islam. Right now, you are just digging and propagating hate, and not helping much. You cam try to help by trying to bridge the gap!
“Every individual is free to choose or adopt the faith in which he believes and to exercise his free thought even if he is an atheist.†so says the Minister of Al-Awqaf (Endowments) Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, Dr. Mahmoud Hamdy Zakzouk.
This being absolutely … in line … with the ‘breaking news’ in posting #2
Dear “Eleonora”,
Now we’re getting somewhere…..Muslims willing to refute the teachings and examples of the ‘prophet’ Muhammed!
I’m specifically talking about these:
Bukhari (83:37) – “Allah’s Apostle never killed anyone except in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted Islam and became an apostate.â€
Bukhari (84:57) – “[In the words of] Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.’â€
Bukhari (89:271) – A man who embraces Islam, then reverts to Judaism is to be killed according to “the verdict of Allah and his apostle.â€
Now…..if we can just get this information circulated far & wide amongst the Ummah, that it’s OK to reject the barbarity of Muhammed, the rest of the world can start to breathe a bit easier.
OK….so what other teachings, examples & mandates of Muhammed (and Allah too I guess, right?) can we reject? I think there are lots of things…..I’ll get back to you on those for your opinion and guidance.
Best regards,
~ The Infidel Alliance
(In Memoriam: The Bali cafe patrons…..innocent tourists…..blown up……twice….just for being ‘infidels’)
[...] via Muslim British government official pelted with eggs | Bikya Masr. [...]
.
I just watched the Baroness Warsi video taken just after she got pelted. She tries to engage two Islamist long beards in a discussion about how pelting women with eggs is ‘un-Islamic’, and then immediately starts to reference ‘the prophet Muhammed” as the moral example.
Should ‘the prophet’ Muhammed really be considered a moral example?
If one reads the Koran, Ahadith, Sunnah & Sira, they will quickly come to the inescapable conclusion that Muhammed was no great moralist but simply a sadistic sociopatic barbarian.
Muhammed was a murderer, a slaver, a human trafficker, a torturer, a mutilator, an amputator, a decapitator, a rapist, a sex slaver, a sexual deviant, a child rapist, a perfidious liar, a caravan raiding looter & thief, a kidknapper, a genocidist and a self proclaimed terrorist.
HOW??? How can an educated, intelligent, modern woman like Baroness Warsi uphold this kind of man as a paragon of human morality to be emulated, which is clearly what she is implying??
Islam will NEVER be at peace because of its schizophenia. It is the “Religion of Peace and Tolerance” that is violent and intolerant, and which upholds a brutal sociopath as its moral ‘holy prophet’. These non-sequiturs can NEVER be rationally reconciled.
Every morbidity which afflicts Islam, and which terrorizes and oppresses Muslims and non-Muslims alike, can be traced directly back to the sociopath Muhammed. It is undeniable.
~ The Infidel Alliance
P.S. – you can see the video here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/beds/bucks/herts/8387110.stm