Ayman Nour: Sectarianism and other untold stories
Jan 17th, 2010 | By Ayman Nour | Category: Ayman Nour, Featured Blogumnist
Never ever fear a nation which examines its actions, and refuses to buck in disclosing its faults and sins. Never ever expect any good from a nation which arrogantly insists on continuing with its mistakes and denying the obvious truth.
Yes, we have a Coptic problem! No one can deny that the crisis of confidence in relationships is the result of many historical and modern accumulations of the problem. Some of them happened by chance and some others were purposefully committed by bad intentions.
We have to confess this unfortunate reality, in order to reach the right diagnosis of the problem and put a clear vision for a remedy. Facing the problem with silence, as usual, is like conspiring to tolerate the crime, which threatens the unity and safety of our homeland. Apathy will only lead us to the painful bottom of agony.
It is our turn now to try clarifying the facts of the crisis and specify its real features and causes.
First: the relationship between sectarian tension and public tension in Egypt. Actually, most of the problems described as “Coptic” are mainly Egyptian problems that are doubled on the Copts. One of them, for instance, is the bitter feeling of the absence of justice, civil rights and equality.
Second: we have a Coptic problem related to media and education. In media, I refuse the demand of some groups to give a special immunity to Copts as much as we refuse using sectarian language in media discourse and the absence of tolerance and the culture of political and religious multiplicity.
On education, school curriculum is still incapable of understanding the real mission of education in enhancing the culture of citizenship and human rights. On his first day in office, the new Minister of Education ordered removing the training programs of human rights and citizenship from school curricula. Moreover, the current curricula are missing proper presentations of Coptic civilization, which continued for more than six centuries in Egypt. Coptic history is an essential part of our civilization; we cannot just ignore or marginalize it in our schools. This would weaken the relationship between citizens to a large degree of their inherited culture!
Third: the overwhelming feeling of injustice for Copts is the result of several factors; e.g. depriving them from occupying certain positions in state in an offensive manner. They are not valued for their patriotism or qualifications. They are classified as second degree citizens, especially in regard to leadership and political positions. Some security apparatuses do not hire Copts at all, like the State Security Bureau.
Fourth: the need for the immediate abolition of the “Hamayouni” manuscript issued in February 1856 by the Sublime Porte, as well as bizarre conditions issued by Major-General Mohamed El-Ezaby Pasha, Minister of Interior, in February 1934 regarding building churches. They should be changed into building a unified law for houses of worship in Egypt in accordance with article 46 of the Constitution, which stipulates citizens’ equal right to practicing religious rituals.
Fifth: The need to issue a number of important legislation to face the reasons behind the sectarian tensions. One of these legislation should provide a penalty for religious discrimination or disdaining religions. Another legislation should handle the personal affairs of Copts. Neveretheless, creating a unified law for building houses of worship. In addition, a new electoral system based on the proportional list should be established in order to give better chances for Copts, women, youth, and other minorities for equal representation in municipal councils, Parliament and the Shura Council.
These are some of the few proposals for the solution of this crisis!
BM
The beliefs and statements of all Bikya Masr blogumnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect our editorial views.
Keep advertising off Bikya Masr - donate $1 to allow this to be possible





















“new electoral system based on the proportional list should be establishedâ€
The Lebanese and Iraqis are trying to abolish their systems and an Egyptian politician is trying to start one ….!
Smart ……. Very smart..!
MM
I didnt read the article but I read the comment above and I really agree that using proportion is not a success in Lebanon and Iraq especially Lebanon that had this system since its independence
but maybe the egyptian case is different we dont have a fifty-fifty percentage kind of distribution
Muslims are a majority by wide margin unlike Iraq and Lebanon two countries that not only have a religious diversity but with some ethnically/sect differences too
on another note I think that what happened in nag3 7amady recently could be interpreted as a violence incident not a terrorist attack by radical Muslims as most of our media outlets are trying to convince us
just because it happened on the Christmas day that doesn’t make it a case of religious violence.
Ahmed,
This medication is worse than the disease
The quota system is bad everywhere, it is an entitlement program, do you think US would ever have a black president or India have a Muslim president, if these countries had a quota system? These gentlemen fought against all odds and presented themselves as NATIONAL candidates
Representatives who come through a quota system know only to speak a sectarian language, in reality, they do not represent their district or constituency.
It is the responsibility of the political parties to foster train and support minorities whom can grow to become national leaders and present themselves in their district as a real representative whom can represent the district and protect the country.
If the Kuwait can elect women, Jordan elect young men, UK/US elect Muslims to their parliaments in open elections; Egypt can if we have the right parties and people.
MM
[...] Ayman Nour: Sectarianism and other untold stories | Bikya Masr Share and [...]
I think you may have misunderstood Nour here. A proportional list system is not the same as a quota, I don’t think this is what he is arguing for (hence the reference to “women, youth, and other minorities”). A party-list system is just a form of proportional representation that is practiced in many countries of the world (and neither in Lebanon nor Iraq, incidentally). It distributes seats according to the proportion of the votes received, unlike in the UK, for example, where a party could hypothetically win 49% of the votes and 0% of the seats. In this way, I agree with Nour, proportional representation would be great for Egypt!